








Articles and Reporting
Another excellent video from Australian military analyst Perun, this time covering the collapse of Russian arms exports dating all the way back to 2014, one of the most important consequences of Putin’s decision to invade Ukraine.
Relevant Statistics
All vehicle losses are visually confirmed only and thus represent the lowest possibly figure (sourced from Oryx, here and here); they are updated to the nearest 25 daily. All personnel losses are estimates or projections and should be viewed as such; they are updated as new information becomes available.




Russia



Ukraine
War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity
Russian forces in Ukraine have committed and continue to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity in the occupied regions of Ukraine, in violation of international law and basic human decency. Russian crimes in Ukraine constitute genocide and ethnic cleansing, with Russia’s stated war aims including the elimination of Ukrainians as a separate country, language, culture, and people.
No especially notable atrocities reported today.
Overview
Ukraine
Russian forces conducted the largest bombardment of Ukrainian civil infrastructure in months, with missile striking power generations facilities across the country. Included in the damage was the Dnieper Hydroelectric Power Plant in Zaporizhzhia (which was disabled, though the dam is intact) and a crucial power line to the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant in occupied Enerhodar.
Russia
Ukraine continued its strike campaign against Russian oil and gas infrastructure, hitting refineries in Samara and Kaluga Oblasts and Krasnodar Krai. The Biden Administration reportedly requested Ukraine cease the attacks to preserve oil prices. Ukraine also reportedly struck a Russian airbase in Saratov Oblast, though it is unclear if any aircraft were damaged.
ISIS terrorists attacked a Moscow concert hall, killing over 130 civilians and wounding hundreds more before escaping. The attack came two weeks after the United States publicly warned about potential threats to “large gatherings in Moscow,” a warning Putin dismissed at the time as spurious. The Kremlin quickly accused Ukraine of aiding in the attack.
Russian dictator Putin “won” his “election” with a claimed 88% of the vote and the highest turnout in Russian history. The Kremlin has systematically suppressed opposition groups, imprisoned or murdered most of Putin’s rivals, and engaged in widespread electoral fraud, including (often mandatory) “voting” in the occupied territories of Ukraine.
For the first time, the Kremlin declared Russia to be “in a state of war with Ukraine,” likely in anticipation of altering the current narrative to support growing Russian mobilization efforts in 2024 and 2025.
Multiple units of anti-Kremlin Russian soldiers launched several more cross-border raids into Russia.
International
European leaders advanced an effort to use the >$3 billion in profits generated by frozen Russian assets to pay for Ukraine’s war effort, with 90% of the revenues to be used for purchasing weapons and the remaining 10% to be invested in European defense industrial capacity. The EU also announced an additional $5.4 billion in Ukraine aid for this year.
Western countries warned they would impose major sanctions on Iran if it transfers ballistic missiles to Russia. Additionally, sanctions on Chinese companies transferring military goods to Russia are being considered.
Some sources, including Polish President Duda, warned that Russia may attempt to attack a NATO nation within the next few years, potentially even in 2026. This is potentially consistent with current Russian mobilization plans (though plans are not reality).
Regional Military Updates

Northern Theatre

🟩 Limited action. Fighting reported northeast of Kupyansk. Fighting reported southeast of Kupyansk. Russian attacks towards Terny, west of Kreminna, made limited gains.
Assessment: No change from previous assessment.
Eastern Theatre


🟧 Significant action. Fighting reported around Bilohorivka. Russian attacks east of Siversk made limited gains. Fighting reported around Spirne. Russian attacks north of Soledar repelled. Russian attacks west of Bakhmut made limited gains. Fighting reported south of Bakhmut. Fighting reported west of Horlivka. Fighting reported southeast of Novokalynove. Russian attacks on Berdychi made gains. Russian forces captured Tonenke. Russian attacks on Pervomaiske made gains. Russian attacks around Krasnohorivka made marginal gains. Russian attacks around Heorhiivka made limited gains. Fighting reported around Pobieda. Russian attacks north of Novomykhailivka made marginal gains. Russian assaults in Novomykhailivka made marginal gains. Ukrainian counterattacks south of Novomykhailivka made marginal gains.
Assessment: No change from previous assessment.
Southern Theatre

🟧 Significant action. Fighting reported around Vuhledar. Fighting reported southeast of Velyka Novosilka. Russian attacks south of Velyka Novosilka made marginal gains. Russian attacks southwest of Velyka Novosilka made marginal gains. Russian attacks east of Mala Tokmachka made marginal gains. Fighting reported northwest of Verbove. Fighting reported around Robotyne. Russian forces captured Myrne, southwest of Orikhiv.
Assessment: No change from previous assessment.
Dnieper Theatre

🟩 Limited action. Fighting reported around Krynky. Russian attacks north of Pidstepne, southwest of Krynky, made marginal gains.
Assessment: No change from previous assessment.
Weekly Conclusion
Note: Today’s Weekly Conclusion is Part 2 of my long-belated post-mortem of the Battle of Avdiivka, focusing on the implications of irresolution and the price of continued failure.
More than anything else, the reason for Avdiivka’s fall was singular: supply. Soldiers and analysts from all sides noted marginal improvements in Russian tactics, but all ascribed the outcome in Avdiivka not to a strength of Russian arms but a deficit of Ukrainian weapons. It was not a matter of will but of materiel, men let down by allies who had promised so often and so loudly to provide.
This is not a temporary concern or an insignificant development. Avdiivka’s fall is just the beginning. Western officials and Ukrainian commanders (including new Commander-in-Chief Colonel General Syrskyi) have warned that further supply problems may soon enable Russian forces to make substantial breakthroughs and advance deep into Ukraine. Yet instead of responding to their concerns, the United States has spent six months squabbling and failing to lead, as Europe – whose limited stockpiles and industry cannot replace deeper American reserves – has scrambled to act as a stopgap, to little avail. And even as they struggle alone, we have found the gall to demand that they stop targeting oil refineries, so much more worried are we by the prospect of paying a dime more for gas than by the waning strength of a cause that we are supposedly sworn to defend.
Two years ago, we promised to assist Ukraine “for as long as it takes.” It seems we are not as good as our word. As the richest nations in history bicker and complain, arguing over how many fractions of a percent of our enormous wealth we should spend, Ukrainians must watch, wait, and suffer the consequences. Each and every day, the cost of our fecklessness is measured in Ukrainian lives, in broken homes and open caskets and empty holes in family photos. Supplies for critical systems are running low, with no replacements in sight. Artillery commanders must decide when and where to use their tiny supply of shells, leaving soldiers to fight on without help or relief. Civilians hide behind an air defense shield whose supply of missiles is dwindling, wondering how many will die in the next air raid, as they huddle together and wait in darkness for the return of the thousands of fathers and sons whose faces will never be seen again.
This is a road that leads only to sorrow.
For now, that sorrow and those costs are borne by Ukraine alone. For now. It is a common refrain that failure is not an option. But the truth is and has always been that it very much is, and even for us, the consequences of that failure are not theoretical. Even a partial Russian victory will unleash a more dangerous world, one with more conquests and more violence, more dictators and more wars. And no matter how hard we try to separate and insulate ourselves from it, this is a world that we still live in. Before long, the bell will toll, the wheel will turn, and history will repeat. The scythe will come first for the least of us – an Estonia, a Moldova, a Taiwan, so small and insignificant and easy to ignore. Then as now, people with the power to act will close their eyes and believe the fates of lesser nations inevitable, unavoidable, the sort of unfortunate thing that could only ever happen to someone who isn’t them. And they will believe it until the day they are finally, inevitably, proven to be wrong.
We do not have the luxury of living in a permanent world. No victory is ever total, and success can never be bought, only leased for a time. The triumph of peace, democracy, and the current international order eight decades ago came at enormous cost, but it was neither ordained by God nor carved in stone. It was built with blood by the unsteady hands of fallible men, and it must be maintained by the hands of their equally fallible successors. Failure is still an option. It always has been. It always will be. And should we fail, here and now, then we will have earned the consequences, and the right to live in the world that comes after.
“The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance, which condition – if he breaks – servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt.”
— John Philpot Curran
